Monday, November 22, 2010

Pay to Play: Cam Newton Scandal



Deviance in sports is running rampant. From on and off the field violence, to illegal recruiting, to illegal activities athletes are engaged in, college sports are getting out of control. Recently, athletes such as Reggie Bush, LeGarrette Blount, and Jeremiah Masoli have been exploited by the media due to there illegal and deviant activities both on and off the field. Also, this past off season stirred up an illegal agent party allegation. All of these are giving college sports a negative light on each. (Coakley, 2009) The most recent scandal is Auburn's Cam Newton accepting illegal funds and being illegally recruited in getting him to play for the Tigers. Cam and his father are accused of telling Mississippi State that it would take money for Cam to play for the Bulldogs. "He said it would take some cash to get Cam," Bond said. "I called our athletic director, Greg Byrne, and he took it from there. That was pretty much it." Also, while at Florida Cam was accused of cheating on tests and stealing some one's laptop(Ruben , 2010) .

Cam left Florida to go to a junior college in Texas called Blinn College. While at Blinn, Cam is reported to telling the Bulldogs that multiple schools have offered him $200,000 to attend their school, but since he had such an interest in Auburn that he would sign for $180,000. Cam, his family, and Auburn deny these accusations. "I'm just trying to protect my son's interests, because he's fought very hard to get back where he is," Cecil Newton said. "It's a hell of a fight when people give up on you and think they'll never see you or hear from you again." Currently, Cam Newton is the starting quarterback for the #1 Auburn Tigers and is the leading candidate for the Heisman trophy. The downfall of these accusations is that they may negatively affect Cam's status in the Heisman committee's views. This will more than likely hold true after the recent finding and stripping of former Heisman trophy winner, Reggie Bush. Auburn coach Gene Chizik reiterated that during his Tiger Talk radio show Thursday night. "Unfortunately, I can't comment on it," Chizik said. "But here's what I can and I will this say very loud and very clear: Cameron Newton is eligible at Auburn University, period. End of story.'' (Forde, Low, & Schlabach, 2010)
Illegal recruiting and accepting of illegal funds from universities and boosters is become more and more present in college athletics. This brings up a related topic on whether college athletes should be paid to play or if the rules should be enforced stricter. The outcome of this accusation may heavily influence which way the NCAA goes with this delicate situation. Illegal recruiting/paying to play cannot be swept under the rug any more and a concrete decision needs to be made.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5765214

Ruben , H. (2010). Cam newton and today's college football: pay to play or penalize? . Bleacher Report, Retrieved from http://bleacherreport.com/articles/520752-todays-college-football-pay-to-play-or-penalize

Forde, P, Low, C, & Schlabach, M. (2010). Cash sought for cam newton. ESPN News, Retrieved from http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5765214

Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in society. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

The Media and Sport



Anymore its impossible to turn on the television and not see something dealing with sports. Sports have taken over the media. Athletes main source of income isn't their contracts they sign, its their endorsement deals. Athletes appear on commercials all the time to sell products. Companies like Nike, Gatorade, and Under Armor are very big endorsers of athletes.

http://whiskey-jim.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/13144606/13625889

Sport is visible through:
  • Movies
  • Magazines
  • Radio
  • Books
  • Newspapers
  • Internet
During last summer's NBA free agency period LeBron James, Dwayne Wade, and Chris Bosh were the three biggest names in the free agency market. Chris Bosh, did a documentery about his talks with other teams, and LeBron James held an hour long special on ESPN called, "The Decision," to tell the entire nation where he was going to go. Millions of people tuned in to see just where LeBron would be playing, and then was followed up by a two week long segment on ESPN and other mainstream sport shows about his decision, where still thousands tuned in.


Although people often access online sport content to complement content they consume in traditional media, many now use new media to replace traditional content. This shift in consumption patterns concerns people in media companies that broadcast live sports world wide, becasue their revenues in the past have depended on controlloing this content and maintaining large audiences to sell to advertisers (Coakley, 2009). Companies use sports to advertise. In professional soccer both over seas and in North America, teams have sponsors that are branded on their unifroms.

Corporations and other companies use sport for a huge advertisement scheme. Pervasive national marketing and exposure tends to make the pinnacle of any sport top heavy. Media focus on big league baseball provides more dollars to the top while robbing farm leagues of viewers and attendees. In baseball Double 'A' games go unattended while potential fans watch the Yankees on TV (Jim, 2009). Companies use sport as a huge marketing tool. At the half time of the Super Bowl, is where a lot of major companies put advertisements, such as Doritios, and Pepsi. Segments sell out quickly for this for the fact of media exposure. Millions of people follow what their favorite athlete does, which they see on t.v., newspapers, magazines, or other forms of media. The influence is HUGE.

None the less media has been greatly influenced by sport and sport has allowed media to excel greatly. Athletes have used media to their advanatge, like Terrell Ownes, and Chado Ochocinco with their t.v. shows they have on VH1. Sport is a vehicle for success, which is why companies have jumped onto the cash cow and have been riding it and will continue to ride it until its dry, and if society continues to go the way its going sport will only grow, and companies revenues will grow through sport.

Jim, W. (2009, February 17). The media and sports. Retrieved from http://whiskey-jim.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/13144606/13625889

Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in society. New York, New York: McGraw Hill Companies Inc.


Athletes and Government Don't Work

Do you ever wonder what happened to the athletes of old, and what some of them are doing today? Well, some of those athletes who were once big time and have left the sport world, do to injury, age, or other circumstances have tried to find their way into some type of government.



Looking back on history there have been many correlations between sport and government being connected. Champions of professional leagues go to visit the White House, and give the President of the United States a jersey with their name on the back. Also, a lot of times presidents (most commonly) throw out the first pitch of a ball game, or do a coin toss at center field. Either way, both political leaders, or athletes get a lot of hype when the two come together, but, does that make a good mixture for athletes to enter into government positions.

As sports grow in popularity, government involvement usually increases. Many sports require sponsorship, organization, and facilities - all of which depend on resources that few individuals possess on their own. Sport facilities may be so expensive that regional and national government's are the only entities with the power and resources to build and maintain them (Coakley, 2009). With government helping sport, and sport promoting government, like athletes for Obama, it makes a good segway for those athletes at the end of their careers to jump into government, right?

I don't believe athletes are a good fit for government for a few reasons:

1. Half of the athletes that want to run for office got into their colleges for athletic ability not their SAT scores.

2. The popularity they have gained from sport is the only popularity that have going for them, not what they believe in their political views.

3. Their spot that they get is more based on their sport reputation, rather then their political representation.

While some argue that athletes like Deng have the ability to do good work in this field, others label the practice as "exchanging gold medals for official titles (Baijie, 2010). There have only been a few athletes who have been successful going from sport to government: Bill Bradley (New York Knicks, U.S. Senator), Jesse Ventura (WWF, Minnesota Governor), Robert B. Mathias (Two-time Olympic gold medalist, U.S. Congressman) ("Career athletes," 2010). Other athletes have tried but have not been elected, such as Lynn Swann.



After a professional career, athletes either face a lot of down time or a lot of rehab. With that down time and their already given popularity they feel they can just jump into government and serve there, because they like everyone else want change and feel they can do it. What makes them any different from another person that has an idea? The same thing that makes them different when it comes to crimes and felonies, they are an athlete, so does that mean they are suitable for a government position, if its just a popularity contest, then yes, absolutely. People want to a leader that is going to do more then just win the popularity vote, especially now, where times are tough and money is tight, people want results. An entire nation on their back is a little more then just a city or state, they now have to pick up the slack for everyone.

Athletes aren't what we need in office, we need people who have devoted half of their lives just spending time studying and finding ways to better life, and better the decisions people will have to make. Athletes entertain, they do not delegate decision that could put millions of people out of jobs, or spend billions on a war in the Middle East. Athletes need to entertain and political advisers need to stick to politics. The two work well when they support one another but don't do one another.

Baijie, A. (2010, September 20). Former athletes face stark choices. Global times, 1(35), Retrieved from http://china.globaltimes.cn/editor-picks/2010-09/575254.html

Career athletes. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.careerathletes.com/whyathletes4.php

Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in society. New York, New York: McGraw Hill Companies Inc.


Sunday, November 21, 2010

Title IX: Quinnipiac Volleyball

Title IX was passed in 1972 and it is a U.S. law prohibiting gender discrimination in schools that
receive federal funds through grants, scholarships, or other support for students. For schools that do not comply, they can be withdrawn from a school engaging in intentional gender discrimination in the provision of curriculum, counseling, academic support, or general educational opportunities. This law was passed to update the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The goal is to give equal opportunities to girls and women as boys and men athletes have. After much initial controversy, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) developed additional legal clarifications in 1975. This states that high schools had one year to comply with regulations and universities have three years to comply before they are punished. In 1979, the OCR created three legal tests to assess compliance with Title IX. They are the proportionality test, history of progress test, and the accommodation of interest test(Coakley, 2009). Title IX has remainded to be a debated topic between high schools, universities, and the Title IX committee. This law has given female athletes better opportunities to participate in sports and has led to a dramatice increase in women sport participation.

Quinnipiac University tried to reach compliance with Title IX by dropping its' womens' volleyball team and adding competetive cheerleading to its sports teams. Members of the volleyball team filed a lawsuit against the school stating this made them not compliant with Title IX. In July 2010, U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill ruled that competitive is not an official sport for schools looking for ways to meet Title IX gender-equity requirements. Underhill gave Quinnipiac 60days to come up with a plan to keep the volleyball team and comply with gender rules. While counting roster sizes, Quinnipiac would count each member of the cross-country, and indoor, outdoor track teams which in some cases had female athletes that participated in all three sports being counted multiple times. Underhill ruled that these female runners may only be counted once(Cloutier, 2010).
“This victory gives force to the law that has opened doors for women over the last 30 years,” said Andrew Schneider, executive director of the ACLU of Connecticut. “Today’s ruling requires QU to stop playing games with the important principle of equal opportunity for women.”(Cloutier, 2010). This case will serve as a guideline for schools across the nation to use and possible model with lawsuits of universities not complying with Title IX requirements. Over the past 8 years, there have been 50 cases dealing with Title IX compliance(Lopiano, 2005). This number will continue to grow to enforce equity between men and women athletics.

Title IX Question and Answers: http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/Content/Articles/Issues/Title%20IX/T/Title%20IX%20Q%20%20A.aspx(Lopiano, 2005)

The 95 page Quinnipiac University Title IX Decision: click in the article to view pdf format:http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/07/22/quinnipiac(Moltz, 2010)


Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in society. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Cloutier, B. (2010, July 21). Quinnipiac title ix case: school must maintain women's volleyball program . New Haven Register, Retrieved from http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2010/07/21/sports/doc4c4734ff92939185795573.txt?viewmode=fullstory

Moltz, D. (2010). Key title ix ruling. Inside Higher ED, Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/07/22/quinnipiac

Lopiano, D. (2005). Title ix q&a. Women's Sports Foundation, Retrieved from http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/Content/Articles/Issues/Title%20IX/T/Title%20IX%20Q%20%20A.aspx

Drug Test and What a Joke It Is

High School Steroid Testing
http://www.guba.com/watch/3000134868/Steroid-Testing-in-High-School-It-Doesn-t-Work




Drug testing is needed to protect athletes' health and reduce the pressure to take substances to keep up with the competitors (Coakley 2009). Drug testing at all levels has been and continues to be a joke. The Olympic, NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB and other major sporting organizations have never done a good job of dealing with drug testing. These leagues/organizations are based on image of the athlete, the athletes are the key to success and how their league will continue to grow. If it came out tomorrow that LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Tom Brady,Peyton Manning, Derek Jeter, Alber Pujols, Sydney Crosby Alex Ovechkin, and Tyson Gay took steroids, the organizations that they fall under would be under huge amounts of scrutney. It would turn fans to what was going on, and proceed to let people think, they are doing it fairly. Drug testing hasn't and will continue not to help, and here is why.



http://www.albanyherald.com/sports/headlines/100860999.html?ref=999


http://www.mesomorphosis.com/articles/anonymous/drug-testing-and-sports-03.htm



The USADA (U.S. Anti-Doping Agency) mission statement and vision states three things:



1. Preserve the Integrity of Competition — We preserve the value and integrity of athletic competition through just initiatives that prevent, deter and detect violations of true sport.



2.Inspire True Sport — We inspire present and future generations of U.S. athletes through initiatives that impart the core principles of true sport — fair play, respect for one’s competitor and respect for the fundamental fairness of competition.



3.Protect the Rights of U.S. Athletes — We protect the right of U.S. Olympic and Paralympic athletes to compete healthy and clean — to achieve their own personal victories as a result of unwavering commitment and hard work — to be celebrated as true heroes.

("Our vision/mission," 2010)


The USADA is responsible for the United States programs that are involved with the Olympics and Paralmpic games. They test these athletes often, using urine samples that are "taken unnanounced," and athletes seem to pass 99.9% of the time. The IOC (International Olympic Committee) also feels the same way about drugs use in the Olympics, but only the are concentrated on all nations who compete for the Olympics. I find it funny that there are very rarely any athletes, especially the big name athletes that ever get caught, until after the fact, i.e Marion Jones.



The other major organizations such as NBA, NFL, MLB, and NHL all drug test their athletes. All of the drug test are to be unannounced so that the test is at random. Until the Mitchell report was filed in 2007 for the MLB there were never any stories about athletes and their use of steroids. Over 100 players on the list were to have positively tested for PED's that we as the fan base never even heard about, until Conseco wrote Juiced. How man people do you think in the NFL or NBA or even the NHL tested positive for steroids that has been unsaid or undocumented. The 'Steel Curtain' of the 70's were to have said to been all on steroids, starting with big bad Jack Lambert. Guys in the MLB werent punished because steroids werent illegal, and dont count the NHL and NBA just because guys are skinnier and dont need to be as big, because you can almost count on there being plenty of athletes to have tested positve.





Sure, there have been a few players in the past couple years to have been tested positive, like Brian Cushing of the Houston Texans, David Ortiz of the Boston Redsox, as of late even Tiger Woods has had the finger pointed at him for steroid usage. A trend here and now is that athletes wont get caught cheating, they wont get caught using because of the technology is to far ahead in their advantages. There are too many outs for athletes to get using seroids.



Testing is ineffective because athletes are one step ahead of rule makers nd testers. By the time substances are banned and tests are developed to detect them, athletes are taking new substances that tests cannot detect or are not calibrated to detect (Assael, 2005, 2007b, 2007c; Bell, 2008; Sokolove, 2004b; Zorpette, 2000). Every steroid that is made is already a step ahead, they are growing in the sense of being undetectible. The question is, will there be a time where steroids will be completely undetectible and all athletes wont have to worry, or, will there be a super test that will detect anything and everything.



Lets see how serious some organizations are about steroid testing, and the whole fair and clean play act. Major League Baseballs Player Association has long been against blood testing. The current drug plan and labor contract run until December 2011, but the union has said it would agree to a validated urine test for HGH. The NCAA’s executive committee has approved cost-cutting changes in the drug-testing program.Future repeat tests will focus on sports and athletes at higher risk and eliminate the advance notice given to those schools and individuals facing additional tests.Ephedrine will be eliminated from all test samples, and future steroids testing at NCAA championships will target higher-risk sports (Press, 2010).



Its been made clear that drug testing isn't a huge priority to these leagues, image is everything and as long as they are more concerned with how they look now and not how their organization should look then they will continue to pretty much tell their athletes that they dont care just as long as they dont get caught. Which is damaging sport for now, and maybe in the future.






Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in society. New York, New York: McGraw Hill Companies Inc.



Press, A. (2010, August 17). Wada chief: mlb drug-testing program a joke . Albany Herald, Retrieved from http://www.albanyherald.com/sports/headlines/100860999.html?ref=999


Our vision/mission. (2010, November 11). Retrieved from http://www.usada.org/?gclid=CInEg-mqs6UCFYbb4AodlzI_Xg

Salary Caps in Professional Sports





http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0910/How-Salary-Caps-Changed-Sports.aspx



In the four major professional sports leagues, NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL, three of them historically always have a salary cap. The 2010-2011 season in the NFL is uncapped and this may be due to the talks of the upcoming strike. The NFL opted out of their collective bargaining agreement with the players union to create this uncapped season. The MLB is the only professional sport that does not traditionally have a salary cap. This gives an advantage to the big market organizations such as the Yankees, Red Sox, and Phillies. These teams are able to put together rosters of many all-star players with enormous contracts. The goal of a salary cap is to limit the amount a team can spend on players' salaries and to keep a balance in the league.


Salary caps directly affect how a player is paid and the division of contracts between the athletes. Salary caps do not influence merchandise and ticket sales as these are determined by profit. Their are different caps such as the hard and soft caps as well as the luxury tax. A hard cap means that the organization must stay under the designated amount to avoid fines, loss of draft picks, and cancellation of contracts(Neiger, 2010). A soft cap means that teams are able to exceed the cap in order to protect the rights of a player who already plays for the team. This has been named the "Larry Bird exemption'' after former Boston Celtic, Larry Bird, was kept with the team until his retirement. The luxury tax is where a team that goes over the determined total payroll pays a tax on the excess amount which is placed into the industry-growth fund. Also, there is a hard floor which means organizations must pay at least the minimum payroll to its players.


Owners must be careful and tedious in their spending of their payrolls. These owners are usually white men. Owners have the final say in contract negotiations and the signing, drafting, and cutting of players(Neiger, 2010). In the NBA, their are eight owners worth over a billion dollars.


The New York Yankees have used their high market to sign players to astronomical contracts such as Alex Rodriguez, CC Sabathia, and Derek Jeter. They have ten players with contracts over 10million dollars and Alex Rodriguez makes a little under 2million dollars less than the entire Pittsburgh Pirates team salary(ESPN, 2010) . Baseball should implement a hard cap to spread team and player equality. This more than likely will not happen because players will not vote on this and they have already suffered a lockout in 1994.


Hopefully, the NBA and NHL continue to use a salary cap and the NFL can come up with some sort of agreement to keep a salary cap keeping players, coaches, owners, commissioner, and fans happy as well as competition fair.








Neiger, C. (2010). How salary caps changed sports. Financial Edge, Retrieved from http://financialedge.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0910/How-Salary-Caps-Changed-Sports.aspx


ESPN, Initials. (2010). New york yankees salary/payroll information-2010. Retrieved from http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/salaries/_/name/nyy/new-york-yankees

Violence on the field: Illegal hits in the NFL

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81b9666c/article/nfl-players-adjust-to-crackdown-on-illegal-hits









The NFL has always been a violent sport. This violence in the sports we love help define our nation as a violent nation. Although on the field violence such as illegal hits, fights, and even offensive language are not the same as murder, rape, and burglary they both parallel America as a whole as a violent society.


Recently, the NFL and Roger Goodell have decided to take a firm stand against illegal hits in the NFL. Canadian sociologist Mike Smith identifies four categories of violence in sports and they are brutal body contact, borderline violence, quasi-criminal violence, and criminal violence. These illegal hits and illegal acts in the NFL fit all four of Smith's categories(Coakley, 2009).


NFL players such as James Harrison, Brandon Meriweather, and Dunta Robinson have all been fined thousands of dollars for these brutal illegal hits. These players along with other NFL players have been vocal about their displeasure with these insane fines. They state that now players are thinking about how to hit instead of just reacting which is changing the way that they have always played the game and in fact causing them to be slower. Fines that add up to 50,000-75,000 definitely have players second guessing their tackling styles because these fines are around 4 games checks. Another argument to these illegal hits is that now players will be tackling lower increasing the chances of knee and ankle injuries(Associated Press, 2010).


Nobody disagrees that player safety is a must in the NFL, just that the NFL is a little fine happy with certain hits. Almost any violent hit to the quarterback gets flagged and fined nowadays in the NFL. Helmet to helmet hits on a defenseless receiver should and are illegal and need to be taken out of the game, but solid tackles that just so happen to be on the quarterback should not be flagged and left as a legal part of the game. The same hit on a running back remains legal but if that hit was applied to a quarterback the chances of a flag go up drastically.


The fining and sending of the tape describing what is legal and what is not legal, definitely has left its mark because the week after the video was sent, there were no fines or illegal hits in all of the 13 games played(Associated Press, 2010). The question is, does this stricter calling on illegal hits make players change their style too much and leaving fans unhappy? Players may think twice about their attack, but the using of the helmet and launching of their bodies at opposing players heads does not need to be in the game of football. Safety is the most important part of the game and needs to continually be a striving point of the very physical and dangerous NFL. Fans of our violent country love seeing these enormous hits, but would not be happy if one of these hits led to their favorite players being concussed, paralyzed, or even worse killed.

Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in society. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

Anderson, R. (Producer). (2010). Nfl videos: player safety. [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-videos/09000d5d81b80962/Player-safety?module=HP_headlines

Associated Press, Initials. (2010, October 24). Nfl players adjust to crackdown on illegal hits. Retrieved from http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81b9666c/article/nfl-players-adjust-to-crackdown-on-illegal-hits